1) Everyone encourages violence. Government is violence. If you participate in democracy, you participate in violence. If you want laws enforced, you want violence done by the state against those who don't follow them. What you mean to say is Tucker is promoting "extralegal violence", & of course he didn't actually do that. Not even close really. Too much of a normie.
2) Using the term terrorist so loosely is reckless & idiotic. BLM isn't a terrorist organization. Tucker Carlson isn't a "terrorist". Stop. You're trivializing what actual terrorist organizations do. You're not afraid of Tucker Carlson, & you're not afraid of someone who tells you you're a sheep for wearing a mask. So just stop. Terrorism is not "violence for political ends", as people like to say when they want to cast their political foes as "terrorists", which they almost never are. This definition is way too broad anyhow. Terrorism is extreme acts of violence (not mocking someone for wearing a mask, which isn't even an act of violence, but blowing up a public square) against innocent civilians so as to strike fear in the heart of civil society, with the goal of coercing government or society itself into taking certain actions or not taking certain actions, political or otherwise. Even Antifa isn't a terrorist organization. It is a bona fide criminal organization since its entire modus operandi is using extralegal violence to silence its political adversaries, but it's not a terrorist organization.
3) You shouldn't make an elementary school aged child wear a mask. It's ridiculous & wrong. A rational society does not make young children bear significant discomfort for hours and hours a day for multiple years, to protect really old & infirm people to the most trivial degrees imaginable. Young children should be free to interact like young children, & to learn essential social skills, & to live ordinary lives, absent the most extraordinary circumstances. COVID is not such a circumstance. Sorry. Is it child abuse to make a young child wear a mask? No, but it's bad parenting. The benefits are not even close to worth the costs.
4) What you're really upset about is that Tucker passed judgment on your parenting and your parenting skills. A lot of people would be upset about that, because most people take parenting very seriously, as they should. But let's be honest, that's what you're so upset about, & so you're lashing out. Instead of reflecting upon what he said, you've decided to equate him with Osama Bin Laden. That's not rational thinking, it's hysterical reacting. If you are really this upset, I think you might be protesting a bit much. Methinks you know deep down you've drank a little too much of the MSM Kool-Aid, & this time your children bore the costs. If you're feeling a twinge of guilt, you're angry at the wrong person.
